🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.